* Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > PS: Nikunj had experimented that pv-flush tlb + > > paravirt-spinlock is a win on PLE where only one of them > > alone could not prove the benefit. > > I'd like to see those numbers, then. > > Ingo, please hold on the kvm-specific patches, meanwhile. I'll hold off on the whole thing - frankly, we don't want this kind of Xen-only complexity. If KVM can make use of PLE then Xen ought to be able to do it as well. If both Xen and KVM makes good use of it then that's a different matter. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
