On 05/07/2012 05:52 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > > Having said that, it is hard for me to resist saying : > > bottleneck is somewhere else on PLE m/c and IMHO answer would be > > combination of paravirt-spinlock + pv-flush-tb. > > > > But I need to come up with good number to argue in favour of the claim. > > > > PS: Nikunj had experimented that pv-flush tlb + paravirt-spinlock is a > > win on PLE where only one of them alone could not prove the benefit. > > > > I'd like to see those numbers, then. > Note: it's probably best to try very wide guests, where the overhead of iterating on all vcpus begins to show. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
