On 05/07/2012 04:46 PM, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > * Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2012-05-07 19:08:51]: > > > I 'll get hold of a PLE mc and come up with the numbers soon. but I > > 'll expect the improvement around 1-3% as it was in last version. > > Deferring preemption (when vcpu is holding lock) may give us better than 1-3% > results on PLE hardware. Something worth trying IMHO. Is the improvement so low, because PLE is interfering with the patch, or because PLE already does a good job? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
