On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Matthew Tippett <tippettm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Can I ask you to do the following... > > 1) Re-affirm that Ubuntu does not carry any non-stream patches and > the build command and possibly any other unusual patches or > commandline options. This should push it back onto Avi and Anthony's > plate. I have put the patches we're carrying here, for your review: * http://rookery.canonical.com/~kirkland/patches There's nothing exotic in here. Most of these have been committed upstream already. All of them have been at least posted on these lists. None of these should affect your test case. We configure with: ./configure --prefix=/usr --disable-blobs --audio-drv-list="alsa pa oss sdl" --audio-card-list="ac97 es1370 sb16 cs4231a adlib gus" --target-list="$(TARGET_SYSTEM_TCG) $(TARGET_LINUX_TCG)" We carry a number of compiler options, mostly in the interest of hardening and security: * https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CompilerFlags The #define'd variables on my local system (which should be similar, though not identical to our build servers) can be seen here: * http://rookery.canonical.com/~kirkland/defined > 2) Carefully consider risks to virtualized environments in the > server space and consider noting it in release notes. Thank you for the suggestion. I will take it under consideration. :-Dustin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
