On 08/25/2009 04:08 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
My preference is ring proxying. Not we'll need ring proxying (or
at least event proxying) for non-MSI guests.
Exactly, that's what I meant earlier. That's enough, isn't it, Anthony?
It is if we have a working implementation that demonstrates the
userspace interface is sufficient. Once it goes into the upstream
kernel, we need to have backwards compatibility code in QEMU forever
to support that kernel version.
Not at all. We still have pure userspace support, so if we don't like
the first two versions of vhost, we can simply not support them. Of
course I'm not advocating merging something known bad or untested, just
pointing out that the cost of an error is not that bad.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
