Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
My preference is ring proxying. Not we'll need ring proxying (or at
least event proxying) for non-MSI guests.
Exactly, that's what I meant earlier. That's enough, isn't it, Anthony?
It is if we have a working implementation that demonstrates the
userspace interface is sufficient. Once it goes into the upstream
kernel, we need to have backwards compatibility code in QEMU forever to
support that kernel version.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
