On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:12:41AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > At Rusty's suggestion, I tested vhost base performance with ping. > Results below, and seem to be what you'd expect. Rusty, any chance you could look at the code? Is it in reasonable shape? I think it makes sense to merge it through you. What do you think? One comment on file placement: I put files under a separate vhost directory to avoid confusion with virtio-net which runs in guest. Does this sound sane? Also, can a minimal version (without TSO, tap or any other features) be merged upstream first so that features can be added later? Or do we have to wait until it's more full featured? Finally, can it reasonably make 2.6.32, or you think it needs more time out of tree? Thanks very much, -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
