Avi Kivity wrote:
I think this is likely going to be needed regardless. I also think
the tap compatibility suggestion would simplify the consumption of
this in userspace.
What about veth pairs?
Does veth support GSO and checksum offload?
I'd like some time to look at get_state/set_state ioctl()s along with
dirty tracking support. It's a much better model for live migration
IMHO.
My preference is ring proxying. Not we'll need ring proxying (or at
least event proxying) for non-MSI guests.
I avoided suggested ring proxying because I didn't want to suggest that
merging should be contingent on it.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
