Re: Boot fails with Unexpected/invalid #address-cells/#size-cells in device tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:20:12 +0100
> From: marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx
> To: jessica.allison.2012@xxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx; kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Boot fails with Unexpected/invalid #address-cells/#size-cells in device tree
>
> On 15/08/12 16:13, Jessica Allison wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:06:49 +0100
> >> From: marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx
> >> To: peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> CC: jessica.allison.2012@xxxxxxxxxxx; kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: Boot fails with Unexpected/invalid #address-cells/#size-cells in device tree
> >>
> >> On 15/08/12 15:50, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>> On 15 August 2012 15:45, Jessica Allison
> >>> <jessica.allison.2012@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>> Yes, when I quickly remove that check in the code, it boots up just fine.
> >>>
> >>> Good (although we should probably do a proper fix and make sure
> >>> we handle 64 bit sizes correctly in the following code).
> >>>
> >>>> Is there already a way to boot up a full graphical user environment on the
> >>>> FastModel simulator with the KVM on ARM kernel?
> >>>> I use
> >>>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git;a=summary
> >>>> for my kernel and the system boots fine into a root shell.
> >>>> Is there a kernel driver for the LCD by now, and included in the device
> >>>> tree?
> >>>
> >>> Graphics via the pl11x should work fine, but I don't think anybody has
> >>> actually tested because the effect of stacking KVM on top of the Fast
> >>> Model means it would run pretty slowly. Try getting it running with
> >>> plain QEMU on x86 first, then the same kernel config should behave
> >>> the same on KVM.
> >>
> >> Only the A9 tile code has some support for its private pl111. The new DT
> >> code has no knowledge of the VE baseboard pl111. Not to mention the
> >> HDLCD on TC1/TC2, which doesn't even have a driver.
> >>
> >> As mentioned in an email to Jessica a while ago, this bit is waiting for
> >> a kind soul who'd actually cares about video output to pick it up...
> >
> > When my kernel boots with the rtsm_ve-cortex_a15x2.dts device tree I see the following error which, I assume, is related to the pl111 not working?
> >
> > clcd-pl11x: probe of 1c1f0000.clcd failed with error -22
>
> That's one of the many problems. I have a really ugly workaround in one
> of my branches that allows the frame buffer to be used, but that patch
> will not go anywhere near mainline:
>
> http://git.us.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git;a=commitdiff;h=de81b299148b84548fe6c563d8d70dcfddf3145c;hp=edf2c53a89824cb5752d42b89997ae8bc96dcff8
>

With the current kernel on the Fast Model simulator, which is the fastest configuration for booting a host+guest? From MMC or NFS or initframfs? Which would be the best practice configuration?

Thanks
Jess

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux