Re: Boot fails with Unexpected/invalid #address-cells/#size-cells in device tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15 August 2012 14:06, Jessica Allison
<jessica.allison.2012@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [bootwrapper] ERROR: Unexpected/invalid #address-cells/#size-cells in device
> tree
> [bootwrapper] BOOT FAILED
>
> I use the bootloader from
> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=arm/models/boot-wrapper.git;a=summary
> I use the arm-dts from  http://linux-arm.org/git?p=arm-dts.git;a=summary -
> downloaded a snapshot from 2012-07-09.
>
> Any idea why my system is not booting up?

ARM device tree blobs recently moved from having #address-cells / #size-cells 1
(ie 32 bit addresses and sizes) to 2 (ie 64 bit addresses and sizes). It
looks like boot-wrapper still assumes 32 bit addresses:

http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=arm/models/boot-wrapper.git;a=blob;f=semi_loader.c;h=66775279185f35096008e7f7af34760486c67ba5;hb=ad44d2cc6569a6f54fd23b69937b042c49d7ffd1#l114

-- PMM
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/kvmarm


[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux