On Wednesday, 14 October 2020 07:35:54 -00 Stakanov wrote: > In data mercoledì 14 ottobre 2020 01:00:23 CEST, Peter Humphrey ha scritto: > > On Tuesday, 13 October 2020 19:37:44 BST Stakanov wrote: > > > YMMV > > > > It does, if you mean differ. As you see, I run Gentoo, in which everything > > is compiled from source (yes, even the compiler). We have no distributors > > deciding for us what we should have. You might give it a try. > > Will try with a kvm virtual machine to see if I get it right. > And yes: YMMV (your mileage may vary). Vary <> Differ. 'Vary' implies change, not difference. -- Regards, Peter. Gentoo testing system, openrc-0.42.1 gcc 10.2.0, sys-kernel/gentoo-sources 5.8.14 QT 5.15.1, KDE frameworks 5.74.0, KDE plasma 5.19.5 KDE apps 20.08.2 incl KMail 5.15.2 (20.08.2), akonadi 20.08.2 dev-db/mariadb-10.5.5, net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.28.4 x11-base/xorg-drivers-1.20-r2
Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Peter Humphrey <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 09:36:41 +0000
- Feedback-id: 82.69.80.10
- In-reply-to: <1707441.X96UURUU5X@roadrunner>
- References: <136308e9-301b-99ae-f775-e24d272e9d87@peerfreedom.org> <5657063.lOV4Wx5bFT@peak> <1707441.X96UURUU5X@roadrunner>
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: dragon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Peter Humphrey
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Stakanov
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Prev by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Next by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Previous by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Next by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client? OT
- Index(es):
 |