On Wednesday October 14 2020 09:35:54 Stakanov wrote: >Will try with a kvm virtual machine to see if I get it right. >And yes: YMMV (your mileage may vary). Literally, with something like Gentoo (though I hope not gas mileage) ;) But it's a nice way to keep your computer busy, if you don't need to be busy with it (you know, being productive on other things than the tools you use to be productive with)... R.
Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: René J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:26:20 +0200
- In-reply-to: <1707441.X96UURUU5X@roadrunner>
- References: <136308e9-301b-99ae-f775-e24d272e9d87@peerfreedom.org> <5657063.lOV4Wx5bFT@peak> <1707441.X96UURUU5X@roadrunner>
- User-agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/4.14.23-ck1-mainline-core2-rjvb; KDE/4.14.38; x86_64; ; )
- References:
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: dragon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Peter Humphrey
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Stakanov
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Prev by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Next by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Previous by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Next by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Index(es):
 |