In data mercoledì 14 ottobre 2020 01:00:23 CEST, Peter Humphrey ha scritto: > On Tuesday, 13 October 2020 19:37:44 BST Stakanov wrote: > > YMMV > > It does, if you mean differ. As you see, I run Gentoo, in which everything > is compiled from source (yes, even the compiler). We have no distributors > deciding for us what we should have. You might give it a try. Will try with a kvm virtual machine to see if I get it right. And yes: YMMV (your mileage may vary).
Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Stakanov <stakanov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 09:35:54 +0200
- In-reply-to: <5657063.lOV4Wx5bFT@peak>
- References: <136308e9-301b-99ae-f775-e24d272e9d87@peerfreedom.org> <2932503.BWtEzYuk16@roadrunner> <5657063.lOV4Wx5bFT@peak>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Peter Humphrey
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: René J.V. Bertin
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- References:
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: dragon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Stakanov
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Peter Humphrey
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Prev by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Next by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Previous by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Next by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Index(es):
 |