On Tuesday, 13 October 2020 19:37:44 BST Stakanov wrote: > YMMV It does, if you mean differ. As you see, I run Gentoo, in which everything is compiled from source (yes, even the compiler). We have no distributors deciding for us what we should have. You might give it a try. -- Regards, Peter. Gentoo testing system, openrc-0.42.1 gcc 10.2.0, sys-kernel/gentoo-sources 5.8.14 QT 5.15.1-r1, KDE frameworks 5.74.0, KDE plasma 5.19.5 KDE apps 20.08.2 incl KMail 5.15.2 (20.08.2), akonadi 20.08.2 dev-db/mariadb-10.5.5, net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.28.4 x11-base/xorg-drivers-1.20-r2
Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Peter Humphrey <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 00:00:23 +0100
- Feedback-id: 82.69.80.10
- In-reply-to: <2932503.BWtEzYuk16@roadrunner>
- References: <136308e9-301b-99ae-f775-e24d272e9d87@peerfreedom.org> <2042044.irdbgypaU6@peak> <2932503.BWtEzYuk16@roadrunner>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Stakanov
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- References:
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: dragon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Peter Humphrey
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Stakanov
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Prev by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Next by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Previous by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Next by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Index(es):
 |