On Monday, 12 October 2020 13:19:17 BST hw wrote: > So no, kmail is still not a viable email client. I can't let that pass. Perhaps something in the way you use it is causing it problems, but although I've said some harsh things about KMail2 in the past, it's been exemplary here for a few years. -- Regards, Peter. Gentoo testing system, openrc-0.42.1 gcc 10.2.0, sys-kernel/gentoo-sources 5.8.14 QT 5.15.1, KDE frameworks 5.74.0, KDE plasma 5.19.5 KDE apps 20.08.2 incl KMail 5.15.2 (20.08.2), akonadi 20.08.2 dev-db/mariadb-10.5.5, net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.28.4 x11-base/xorg-drivers-1.20-r2
Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Peter Humphrey <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 18:16:02 +0100
- Feedback-id: 82.69.80.10
- In-reply-to: <c5154d613571d6199793797e08b0026c8df66552.camel@adminart.net>
- References: <136308e9-301b-99ae-f775-e24d272e9d87@peerfreedom.org> <2346518.0pVBLmrVHE@tuxls> <c5154d613571d6199793797e08b0026c8df66552.camel@adminart.net>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: René J.V. Bertin
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Stakanov
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- References:
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: dragon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: Marek Kochanowicz
- Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- From: hw
- Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Prev by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Next by Date: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Previous by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Next by thread: Re: Years later, kmail still is not a viable email client?
- Index(es):
 |