On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 03:55:10PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Ville Syrjala (2019-06-18 15:21:08)
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Move the .get_vblank_timestamp() and .get_scanout_position()
> > initialization to happen at compile time. No point in delaying
> > it since we always assign the same functions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 3 +++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 11 ++++-------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.h | 5 +++++
> > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > index ea6b06109d5a..178e9872b905 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > @@ -3216,6 +3216,9 @@ static struct drm_driver driver = {
> > .gem_prime_export = i915_gem_prime_export,
> > .gem_prime_import = i915_gem_prime_import,
> >
> > + .get_vblank_timestamp = drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos,
> > + .get_scanout_position = i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos,
>
> One might suggest intel_get_crtc_scanoutpos, and a push for it to be
> passed drm_crtc instead of dev + pipe.
I suppose. There's also a FIXME about moving it to the crtc_helper funcs
instead. Or could just remove the vfunc entirely and have each driver
pass it to drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos(). Either that or
eliminate the .get_vblank_timestamp() vfunc instead since I believe
everyone who has that uses drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos().
Anyways, looks like there's enough material there for a good few hours
of cursing.
>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> -Chris
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
