Quoting Ville Syrjala (2019-06-18 15:21:08)
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Move the .get_vblank_timestamp() and .get_scanout_position()
> initialization to happen at compile time. No point in delaying
> it since we always assign the same functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 11 ++++-------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.h | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index ea6b06109d5a..178e9872b905 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -3216,6 +3216,9 @@ static struct drm_driver driver = {
> .gem_prime_export = i915_gem_prime_export,
> .gem_prime_import = i915_gem_prime_import,
>
> + .get_vblank_timestamp = drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos,
> + .get_scanout_position = i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos,
One might suggest intel_get_crtc_scanoutpos, and a push for it to be
passed drm_crtc instead of dev + pipe.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
