Sounds like you (several) are saying that you can not imagine any
conditions under which we should hold the July IETF face-to-face.
So ask the criteria question differently. What criteria should we as a
community agree to apply to the decision as to whether to hold the
November IETF meeting face-to-face? I presume that by the early May
date that has been set, Madrid will fail those criteria. So we as a
community will have a good basis for moving forward.
As far as I can tell, the reason the IESG / LLC set such a short time
frame for determining the criteria is precisly so that they can then get
on to planning the meeting in the appropriate fashion.
Note that if they had simply said "we know the July meeting will be
remote", a (presumably different) set of people would have complained
about "how did you decide that?"
Yours,
Joel
On 4/19/2020 3:32 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 11:38 AM Kathleen Moriarty
<kathleen.moriarty.ietf@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:kathleen.moriarty.ietf@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Major corporations are not going to support travel in June..
I would be very disappointed if any security provider did.
