Re: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Major corporations are not going to support travel in June..  We won't have a vaccine and bringing that many people together is sure to lead to an outbreak.  After seeing what happened locally (Boston, MA) at the Biogen meeting with about 100/175 attendees getting sick, I would not consider attending a meeting in July in person.  This also makes a decision for AMS and that isn't fair (IMO).  I hope they are factored into this process as many of our corporations have done for us (preventing travel and valuing our health).  

It would be nice to move on and figure out how to best run virtual meetings and improve upon learnings as opposed to having this discussions.  Let's spend our time well.

Best regards,
Kathleen


On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 1:28 AM Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2020-04-19, at 07:18, Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> s/virtual/online/

+∞

(If we don’t get that fixed, I’ll use virtual banking to pay my attendee fees in the future…)

Grüße, Carsten



--

Best regards,
Kathleen

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux