On 29-Mar-20 09:37, Scott O. Bradner wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 28, 2020, at 4:19 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
> …
>
>>
>> The NomCom Chair has not been appointed, and is subject to the same eligibility rules as the volunteer pool. At the moment, the ISOC President cannot appoint a chair because he cannot know who is eligible. So we are in a vacuum until the IESG exercises its judgement. (Which is why I don't think we should go the draft-resnick-variance route.)
>>
>> Stay well,
>> Brian
>>
>
> actually, there is a significant pool of people that qualify even if one assumes the the last meeting did or did not happen
> (i.e. people who had been at 3 of the 4 meetings 103, 104, 105 & 106) you would lose some people that were at only
> two of those meetings and were at meeting 102 or meeting 107 (depending on how the decision comes out) but the
> ISOC president could move ahead if he wanted to
>
> Scott
Well, that's not immune to challenge, which is why I believe that almost any choice that the IESG could make is fine, as long as it's notified to the ISOC Board. That wouldn't completely immunise against an appeal but would make an appeal highly unlikely to succeed.
Certainly if we can get a BCP out very quickly that would do fine, but it would have to be a very minimal BCP whose 4 week last call starts in the next week or two.
Brian
