On 24 Mar 2020, at 18:04, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On Mar 25, 2020, at 5:08 AM, Michael Richardson
<mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But, I agree that making IETF108 virtual is probably best.
What I'd like to see is that we agree
1) that the Madrid Time Zone will be used for all plenary stuff
Why? If IETF 108 becomes virtual, then there’ll be no relationship
with Madrid at all.
As with the current, ongoing virtual IETF 107 (which has no
relationship with Vancouver), just choose a time zone that (tries to)
work best for the worldwide IETF community.
The schedule for 107 maps pretty well to the Vancouver time zone. I
think a reason one might choose Madrid as the time zone for 108 if we
have to go virtual fits pretty well with the intention of RFC 8719:
[The North America / Asia / Europe] meeting
rotation is mainly aimed at distributing the travel effort for the
existing IETF participants who physically attend meetings and for
distributing the timezone difficulty for those who participate
remotely.
pr
--
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best
