> On Mar 25, 2020, at 5:08 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But, I agree that making IETF108 virtual is probably best. > > What I'd like to see is that we agree > 1) that the Madrid Time Zone will be used for all plenary stuff Why? If IETF 108 becomes virtual, then there’ll be no relationship with Madrid at all. As with the current, ongoing virtual IETF 107 (which has no relationship with Vancouver), just choose a time zone that (tries to) work best for the worldwide IETF community. Ross.
