Re: IETF in July

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Tuesday, March 24, 2020 15:42 -0300 Fernando Gont
<fgont@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I have no idea the principles under which, in a situation
> where there's individual vs. corporate and funded vs.
> non-funded and participation from countries with totally
> different economic situations and currency exchange rates,
> such a list could be a data source for "shaming"...
> 
> Talk about diversity....

Which is why those of us who often participate (as distinct from
observing/ listening in) remotely and who have argued, for some
years, for a fee have suggested some reasonably small fixed fee
and a mechanism for individuals quietly and privately asking for
a waiver when the fee would be a hardship ... approximately the
same mechanism that has applied to registration fees for
in-person meetings for a very long time.   If people want to
make additional contributions, see John Levine's recent note.  

It is not clear to me that trying to shame either other is ever
going to be a good approach in this community.

best,
  john




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux