On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 12:30 PM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
With regard to citing RFC 5742, I will leave it to the judgment of the
document shepherd and AD as to whether they believe that is called for.
It seems more distracting than useful to me, but I will act as they direct.
Whether or not my proposal is accepted, the document does need a reference to define those streams.
RFC 4844 or RFC 5742 would do. Minimally, the authors could simply add [RFC4844] to the existing text.
My proposal is clearer, though.
thanks,
Rob
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
