On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 12:10 PM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rob, I can see no reason why this document would change what is or is
not considered an end-run.
OK. I think the document should cite RFC 5742 in its description of the other streams. Given your statement, I propose this edit:
One could argue that there is a need for publishing some documents
that the community can not agree on. However, we have an explicit
procedure for such publication, namely the Independent Stream. Or,
for research documents, the IRTF stream, which explicitly publishes
many minority opinion Informational RFCs. RFC 5742 describes the
that the community can not agree on. However, we have an explicit
procedure for such publication, namely the Independent Stream. Or,
for research documents, the IRTF stream, which explicitly publishes
many minority opinion Informational RFCs. RFC 5742 describes the
IESG procedures for the handling of those streams, and this document
introduces no new requirements to those procedures.
Editorial nits:
- The capitalization of "Stream" is inconsistent.
- typo: "the IAB SHOULD use its authorithy"
thanks,
Rob
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
