On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 10:31:00PM -0800, Rob Sayre wrote:
> At the very least, one might concede that the usefulness of DNSSEC is a
> matter of debate.
There is no debating that some find it useful. Their use-cases
(priorities) may be different from yours. That is, there's nothing to
debate.
> I actually happen to think DNSSEC might be useful once DNS transports are
> encrypted, which the IETF has screwed up for 30 years. However, the DNSSEC
> RFC is 15 years old, so I don't think it's generally productive to bring up
> in new work.
The base insecure DNS, SMTP, TCP are older still, and we continue to use
them and build on them. There's no meat on this bone of contention, and
it is in any case a digression. Let's move on.
--
Viktor.
