Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I emphatically disagree. URNs have defined properties that URIs in general do
> not. The constant efforts by those politically opposed to URNs because of Not
> Invented Here syndrome, to degrade the utility of URNs, have been obvious for
> a long time now, and can only be understood as deliberate efforts to cause
> harm.
I really wanted URNs to succeed.
I have not seen this occur. Either that's because they are too hard to use,
or there isn't any compelling reason to use them. I don't know which.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
