Re: URNs and Last Call: <draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02.txt> (URI Design and Ownership) to Best Current Practice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/7/20 2:33 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>     > I emphatically disagree. URNs have defined properties that URIs in general do
>     > not. The constant efforts by those politically opposed to URNs because of Not
>     > Invented Here syndrome, to degrade the utility of URNs, have been obvious for
>     > a long time now, and can only be understood as deliberate efforts to cause
>     > harm.
> 
> I really wanted URNs to succeed.
> 
> I have not seen this occur. 

Definitions of success vary. URNs are widely used in the information
sciences (e.g., national libraries), but that isn't as visible as the web.

Peter

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux