On 09-Nov-19 05:25, Keith Moore wrote: .... > I see no substitute for a community-wide review. On 08-Nov-19 22:49, Ole Troan wrote: > I have for a long time been uncomfortable with the level of document changes that happens after the document leaves the working group. .... > Basically I want the IESG for leadership. I want the IESG for quality control. I do not want the IESG to have to read every document, nitpick or even (gasp) override working group consensus. > > Executive summary: More leadership less document editing. Violent agreement with all of the above. And again - this is all procedural, no change to IETF rules is needed. I begin to realise that the IESG's workload is in its own hands, and we (all of us who've served in the IESG over the last 20 years) have to share the blame for current practice. Brian
