Re: why is it still mandatary to have Jabber scribing for WG session given Etherpad can allow anyone to post questions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 7 Aug 2019, at 18:13, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 8/6/19 11:26 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 07:55:11AM +0300, Yoav Nir wrote:
>>> The jabber room also works as a back-channel for both remote and local
>>> participants.  Sometimes the conversation there is at least as useful
>>> as the one in the room.
>> 
>> I'm all for keeping jabber.
>> 
>> I'm not sure we need a scribe at all now that we have meetecho and
>> decent sound, 
> 
> How do remote participants get their questions asked at the mic line?

Indeed, the jabber scribe is now to all intents and purposes a jabber relay..

>> except perhaps when there are hard-of-hearing participants
>> in the room.
> 
> Accessibility is a thing. :-)


Indeed!

Tim





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux