Re: why is it still mandatary to have Jabber scribing for WG session given Etherpad can allow anyone to post questions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/7/19 11:15 AM, Tim Chown wrote:
>> On 7 Aug 2019, at 18:13, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/6/19 11:26 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 07:55:11AM +0300, Yoav Nir wrote:
>>>> The jabber room also works as a back-channel for both remote and local
>>>> participants.  Sometimes the conversation there is at least as useful
>>>> as the one in the room.
>>>
>>> I'm all for keeping jabber.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure we need a scribe at all now that we have meetecho and
>>> decent sound, 
>>
>> How do remote participants get their questions asked at the mic line?
> 
> Indeed, the jabber scribe is now to all intents and purposes a jabber relay.

I think it always was. We tried to change that terminology in RFC 7649
but the terminology was already set in stone.

Peter




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux