I was remote for the Montreal meeting and found Jabber much more convenient for questions than raising my virtual hand, waiting to be recognized, and then speaking my question.
Cheers,
Andy
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 1:13 PM Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 8/6/19 11:26 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 07:55:11AM +0300, Yoav Nir wrote:
>> The jabber room also works as a back-channel for both remote and local
>> participants. Sometimes the conversation there is at least as useful
>> as the one in the room.
>
> I'm all for keeping jabber.
>
> I'm not sure we need a scribe at all now that we have meetecho and
> decent sound,
How do remote participants get their questions asked at the mic line?
> except perhaps when there are hard-of-hearing participants
> in the room.
Accessibility is a thing. :-)
Peter
