Re: is there a specific proposal for living ops docs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



That's exactly why I asked about RIPE's solution. Before proposing
a solution, don't we want to study one that apparently works?

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 20-Jul-19 07:24, Keith Moore wrote:
> It seems like we've reached a point of diminishing returns with this 
> discussion since AFAIK we don't actually have specifics to evaluate or 
> argue about.    Maybe the next thing to do for those who want to propose 
> this for ops is to go off and write an I-D proposing mechanisms and 
> processes?    One that could address the expressed concerns?   Any 
> process change has to earn IETF consensus after all.
> 
> (or if I missed the I-D that proposes mechanisms and process, please 
> point me to it)
> 
> Keith
> 
> 
> 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux