Re: And a third [was: A couple of opinion pieces]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 3:03 PM Leif Johansson <leifj@xxxxxx> wrote:


Skickat från min iPhone

> 16 juli 2019 kl. 19:28 skrev Pete Resnick <resnick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> On 16 Jul 2019, at 3:54, Leif Johansson wrote:
>>
>> ...for smaller companies
>> whose primary IPR assets is tied up in that one strategic standards
>> process, its probably not surprising that other IPR models seem very
>> attractive. In particular variations on the theme "everyone keep their
>> IPR, promise not to litigate and publish after SDO agrees on what the
>> standard is" has been pretty common.
>
> People tend to forget that you can pretty much do that IPR model in the IETF if you really want to.

Has anyone ever done so?

The PKCS standards were this way for a while, but I recently (last fe years) assisted with transferring change control over.

Best regards,
Kathleen
 

>
> pr
> --
> Pete Resnick http://www.episteme.net/
> All connections to the world are tenuous at best



--

Best regards,
Kathleen

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux