Re: On XML and $EDITORs (Re: Things that used to be clear (was ...)) "Living Documents") side meeting at IETF105.)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jul 11, 2019, at 10:25 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx> wrote:
The insertion of the second one could indeed be automated, but then you
would have to give a hint about normative vs informative.

That would actually be a really nice enhancement.   It could be the rule that if no reference says, it’s normative, if all references either don’t say or say normative, it’s normative, if all don’t say or say informative, it’s informative, and if some say normative and some say informative, it’s informative.   The idea being that some references to the same document may be normative and some informative, and it makes sense to be able to signal that in the XML.  Maybe every reference should say, but I’m sure that would be a pain.

It would also be nice if the publication date could default to “today” and if the draft number could be determined automatically based on what is most recent…


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux