No, a fully-developed solution is not necessary. But something more
than a plaintive "there has to be a better way". Particularly from
someone like you who has been through all of this multiple times before.
Yours,
Joel
On 5/12/19 8:16 PM, Keith Moore wrote:
So a fully-developed solution (or nearly so) must be proposed before
there can be any discussion of the problem?
(And therefore the solution that's proposed must only respond to the
views of one person or a small number of people?)
Keith
On 5/12/19 8:09 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
People periodically suggest that the structure should be different to
facilitate better participation by "another group" that we would like
to have.
But simply saying "maybe a different structure would work" does not
help anyone. Without an actual alternative on the table there isn't
even anything to discuss.
We have made changes to improve remote participation. There are
proposals to empower more participants in more ways. In each case
these are based on concrete proposals to address concrete problems.
Not "we can do better".
