Sent from my mobile device > On Mar 19, 2019, at 4:52 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I had asked this question on an earlier version of this draft and want to >> poke at it again. Is the focus on end users the best and most effective way >> to achieve the same objective? Could the focus of this work be shifted to >> privacy and providing anonymity in protocols instead? > > You have actually jumped to a conclusion that the end users want privacy and > anonymity. I'm not saying you are wrong, but that you have just made > a value judgement indicating which constituency that represents. > > As Eliot's list indicates, that's not always the desire of all users! Fair point! I was trying to reframe this into something that might stand the test of time better. My thinking was that we have thought about security, privacy, and somewhat on human rights, but have not broken out the latter clearly enough and was going at that angle. Perhaps there’s a better way to do this? Thank you, Kathleen > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works > -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- > > >
