Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I had asked this question on an earlier version of this draft and want to
> poke at it again. Is the focus on end users the best and most effective way
> to achieve the same objective? Could the focus of this work be shifted to
> privacy and providing anonymity in protocols instead?
You have actually jumped to a conclusion that the end users want privacy and
anonymity. I'm not saying you are wrong, but that you have just made
a value judgement indicating which constituency that represents.
As Eliot's list indicates, that's not always the desire of all users!
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
