Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-consolidated-upd-07.txt> (Consolidated IASA 2.0 Updates of IETF Administrative Terminology) to Best Current Practice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It is now moot – since I (as WG co-chair) replied earlier today, which was a roughly 2 business day response time. :-)

 

Regards

Jason

 

From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> on behalf of Eric Rescorla <ekr@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, March 18, 2019 at 12:07 PM
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-consolidated-upd-07.txt> (Consolidated IASA 2.0 Updates of IETF Administrative Terminology) to Best Current Practice

 

 

 

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 8:57 AM S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear Mr Rescorla,
At 04:52 AM 18-03-2019, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>Is there reason to think this will happen? April 1 is quite some time away.

Ms Cooper mentioned weekends.  There could be other reasons as well,
for example, public holidays.  I do not know which days are public
holidays in the countries where Mr Livingood and Mr Peterson
reside.  Those persons might have work commitments.

 

Yes, they might, but floating an extension of last call after 4 days of nonresponse including a weekend seems... -premature.

-Ekr

 


Regards,
S. Moonesamy


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux