Re: AD Time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:07:26PM -0700, Padma Pillay-Esnault wrote:
> > Long term training has good ROI but I also think the outcome should be a
> flexible and flowing process adjusted to current needs rather than a
> regimented one which ends up being inadequate for other areas or worse
> obsolete very fast because different ADs or areas have different styles.
> 
> >
> > I couldn't quite parse that.
> >
> >
> There is no one fix for all the documents or all areas even. Depending on
> the area technologies, style of work the AD, or his/her background,
> defining what is really helpful for the particular document currently is
> bound to have variations. Attempts to codify this rigidly is only going to
> lead to inefficiency imho. Boils down that delegation to be efficient is a
> collaborative process.
> 
> Padma

Thanks!

Definitely no codification because we seem to be far away from any proven
process that works better than how its handled by ADs today. BUt i wonder
if there is any process to accumulate institutional wisdom. Like Ted's
comments re investing into the directorate.

Cheers
    Torless




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux