On 16/05/2018 02:43, Michael Richardson wrote:
It would be nice if there was a survey asking people about WG conflicts for 101,
102 and 103. (We could go back further, but remembering 101 will be hard
enough)
Yes, because my experience is that the IESG are not getting this right.
Sure some responsibility
belongs with the chairs, but I would expect the IESG to add to that
input and modify the conflict sets
accordingly.
I would be good to have some hard evidence through a survey of what
conflicts the attendees
think were a problem.
Stewart
