Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I have yet to see any comments on the fact that we have O(30) working
> groups ask not to be scheduled on Fridays every single meeting. One of
> my personal hopes for this experiment is that we learn whether we can
> avoid these requests (and the consequent scheduling complications,
> which are non-trivial) by simply removing the broadly unwanted Friday
> slots from consideration altogether.

Or the other option is to simply overbook ourselves from M-Th.  Which
would people prefer?

1) Give in to the longer and longer IETF sessions as we need to get
   there earlier and earlier.  [It's certainly hitting me personally.]

2) Having *and attending* meetings on Friday

3) Or cramming more sessions in during the rest of the week (e.g.,
   throwing out the social and Tuesday and the Meet-n-greet on Thursday)
   and having an additional slots then?

It's all weighted choices with no good answer, of course.  Don't shoot
the questioner please :-)
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux