Re: Proposed Photography Policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Mar 2, 2018, at 6:41 PM, Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

We have an ombudsteam precisely because we really don't want harassment to reach the level of civil suits before being addressed. 

I’ve already agreed it’s useful to address commercial photography. For everything else, we  already have an anti-harassment policy.

Providing further details are not, IMO, useful or productive. The people who most need to read it either won’t or already know what they’re doing is harassment. 

Besides, if the issue were really about creating a conducive environment, it would be more useful to start with “don’t knock people over to get a cookie at the break”.

Joe



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux