|
On 3/2/18 8:37 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
On 3/2/18 8:33 PM, Joe Touch
wrote:
On Mar 2, 2018, at 6:23 PM, Mark
Nottingham < mnot@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
The point
is to create expectations about how participants
will treat each other.
Expectations, as I noted, are not an
issue.
The issue is when we imply that there are
consequences when those expectations are not met.
That’s when things get entangled and detailed in ways
that have collateral damage to other interactions.
If someone asks you to stop doing something to them and
you don't, there is a very real chance that there will be
consequences one way or another. I can't imagine why
photography would be different in this regard than any
other actions.
It isn’t, but we don’t need an IETF policy for that to
happen. There are already legal remedies.
We have an ombudsteam precisely because we really don't want
harassment to reach the level of civil suits before being addressed.
There's a huge gulf between "destructive to productivity and
inclusiveness" and "lawsuit-worthy." If "lawsuit-worthy" is your
benchmark for what behaviors you consider okay, I'm have serious
reservations about your judgement in this matter.
/a
|
