Re: Proposed Photography Policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In this era where "everyone is a publisher and a photographer," I can
well imagine situations where a closeup of a person (badge visible)
gets "published" in a way that such a person may find uncomfortable.
Since I am male and white, I tend not to worry too much this, nor do
I worry about walking alone at night, but I do understand the issue.

Ole

On Sat, 3 Mar 2018, Ross Finlayson wrote:

> 
> > On Mar 3, 2018, at 4:33 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > Mixing human labelling and a asking for people to respect the 
> > labels is doomed to protocol failure.
> 
> Agreed.  And as a practical matter, I think we’d find that someone 
> who wore a "do not photograph” label would find themselves 
> inadvertently getting *more* scrutiny at an IETF meeting, not less.  
> I.e., if you saw someone wearing such a label (unless they were very 
> common), your natural reaction (as much as you might try to do 
> otherwise) would be to look more closely at their name tag to note 
> who they are (and then internally speculate on why they might not 
> want to be photographed).
> 
> I don’t deny that there are people out there who would find it 
> uncomfortable to be photographed (or even looked at) in a public 
> forum such as an IETF meeting.  Most such people would probably end 
> up preferring to attend the meeting remotely.
> 
> 	Ross.
> 
> 

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux