Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You have it backwards - the broken shards are the NATted IPv4 Internet.   Not completely useless, but much less functional than the Internet should be, and impeding a transition to a much more functional one.

On 09/18/2017 06:17 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
If you want to reduce this to analogies, your proposal is much closer to the situation we had in the IETF a couple of decades ago when it came to NATs: we preferred architecturally pristine approaches that shattered into useless, broken shards on contact with reality.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]