Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?



On 30/01/2017 11:52, Leif Johansson wrote:

relocated to Europe or elsewhere (at least for the next 8 years "until
we know what's going on there" ;-).

nailed it


Maybe the ITU could host us in Geneva :)

Being a UN body they have hosting rights for all UN recognisedcountries, and presumable a few more besides.


Stewart

References:
- If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
  - From: Dave Burstein
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
  - From: Adam Roach
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
  - From: Rich Kulawiec
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
  - From: Jari Arkko
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
  - From: Stephen Farrell
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
  - From: Dave Crocker
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
  - From: Melinda Shore
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
  - From: Naeem Khademi
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
  - From: Leif Johansson