Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/29/2017 5:31 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
I think the ACM text could be quite close to something
on which we could garner IETF consensus as it mostly
says just the above.


The folk at the head of the current administration don't care about such statements. But perhaps others who can effect change might.

And yes, the ACM text is quite reasonable.

I suggest trying to get a /collection/ of related organizations to issue a joint text, with the goal of suggesting the aggregate damage that will accrue if "freedom of movement, association, expression and communication for scientists" is not permitted.

That is, build on the ACM effort, getting ISOC, W3C, IEEE, and more to sign it jointly.

d/


--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]