Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 1/29/17 4:39 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> The folk at the head of the current administration don't care about such
> statements.  But perhaps others who can effect change might.

Right, including our congressional representatives.  There is
likely to be a legislative response to what the administration
is trying to do, and if industry bodies speak up that can
provide them additional support and cover, I think.

I do think that issuing both IETF-only and joint statements
with other organizations would be a good thing.

Don't forget the courts, while I doubt the IETF would have standing, or the finances, to actually be a litigant, but it could prepare few amicus briefs explaining the impact of this overreach on the IETF.  They might even be useful in the court and legislative hearings that will undoubtedly occur.      

--
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer@xxxxxxx
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota  
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]