On 18/12/15 21:31, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: > Let me ask, since you clearly have opinions on such matters - what > would you think of such an arrangement? What am I missing in such a > proposal? Returning to known-good venues is a good plan. Ones like Berlin and Prague are especially good as they cater well for those who hardly leave the venue all week as well as for those who are involved only in specific things that allow them more free time. (And that latter group is hugely important as I'd bet almost all of the former group started out in the latter group.) 9 years is too far ahead to know for sure that we'll have the same kind of 3 x 1400-people meetings per year. I'd be surprised if that's the case in 2024 to be honest, but it could be. I'm not sure how best to handle that but I'd be against an arrangement that forced the IETF to keep doing the same kind of meetings that far ahead. If there's an acceptable way to get changes agreed every 2 years or so that'd be ok though. I'm fine that the IAOC figure out what they consider acceptable, but would prefer that as much as possible of that be visible to the community before final agreements are reached. S.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature